Changes in the Residential Spatial Patterns of the Sentani Indigenous Community Based on the Khani He Kla He Cultural Concept

Authors

  • Anriani Safar Universitas Hasanuddin Author

Keywords:

Changes, Spatial Patterns, Community, Sentani, Khani He Kla He Culture

Abstract

The Sentani indigenous community has local wisdom in the form of residential spatial arrangements based on the Khani He Kla He cultural concept, which has been in existence since ancient times. The aim of this research is to understand the Khani He Kla He cultural concept as a foundation for changes in residential spatial patterns in Sentani city. This study employs a qualitative research approach with Diachronic Reading methodology supported by Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. The findings of this research indicate that the principles of the Khani He Kla He culture prioritize environmental and natural preservation by prohibiting the establishment of villages or settlements on land considered to still provide life. This is a rule concerning residential patterns and land use, which establishes territorial boundaries based on zoning according to its designated function and purpose. In addition to designating land for residential purposes, the Khani He Kla He culture also defines sacred areas such as forests, hunting grounds, and foraging sites. However, current phenomena show that urban development has caused a shift in the cultural values that constitute local wisdom. As a result, the residential patterns that characterize the indigenous community are eroding and may eventually disappear over time. To understand the changes in the settlement patterns of the Sentani indigenous community based on the Khani He Kla He cultural concept and the influencing factors, this research was conducted. The conclusion of this study is that the Khani He Kla He cultural values serve as the residential patterns for the Sentani indigenous community and that the preservation of local culture must be maintained. 

References

Altman, J. C., & Markham, F. (2015). Burgeoning Indigenous Land Ownership: Diverse Values and Strategic Potentialities. Australian Geographer, 46(4), 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2015.1077532

Barume, A. K. (2010). Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Africa: With Case Studies from Cameroon, Kenya, Namibia, and South Africa. IWGIA.

Battiste, M. (2008). Research Ethics for Protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage: Institutional and Researcher Responsibilities. Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies, 497-510. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686.n25

Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred Ecology (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315114644

Buergin, R. (2003). Shifting Frames for Local People and Forests in a Global Heritage: The Thung Yai Naresuan Wildlife Sanctuary in the Context of Thailand's Globalization and Modernization. Geoforum, 34(3), 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00074-9

Cuerrier, A., Turner, N. J., Gomes, T. C., Garibaldi, A., & Downing, A. (2015). Cultural Keystone Places: Conservation and Restoration in Cultural Landscapes. Journal of Ethnobiology, 35(3), 427-448. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-35.3.427

Dixon, P. (2014). Indigenous Spatial Knowledge and the Politics of Land Use in Northern Canada. Polar Record, 50(4), 420-429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224741300052X

Fabinyi, M., Evans, L., & Foale, S. J. (2014). Social-ecological Systems, Social Diversity, and Power: Insights from Anthropology and Political Ecology. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07029-190428

Gambold, R. & Parrott, L. (2020). Modeling the Role of Local Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Management. Ecology and Society, 25(4), 22. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11912-250422

Hartanto, H., et al. (2003). The Impact of Decentralization on Adaptive Capacity in the Forestry Sector. Environmental Management, 31(1), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2802-3

Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2006). Resilience, Vulnerability, and Adaptation: A Cross-Cutting Theme of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 237-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.003

Kimmerer, R. W. (2012). Weaving Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Biological Education: A Call to Action. BioScience, 52(5), 432-438. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0432:WTEKIB]2.0.CO;2

Maffi, L., & Woodley, E. (2010). Biocultural Diversity Conservation: A Global Sourcebook. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774697

McGregor, D. (2004). Coming Full Circle: Indigenous Knowledge, Environment, and Our Future. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3/4), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2004.0101

Paci, C. D. J., Tobin, A., & Robb, P. (2002). Reconsidering the Canadian Environmental Impact Assessment Act: A Place for Traditional Environmental Knowledge. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00102-1

Downloads

Published

2024-12-16