Implementation of Process Standards by Certified Teachers in Social Studies (IPS) Teaching at Junior High Schools in Pariaman Tengah District, Pariaman City

Authors

  • Serli Muchlian STKIP Ahlussunnah Bukittinggi Author

Keywords:

Certified Teachers, 2013 Curriculum, Authentic Assessment, Scientific Approach, Social Studies Teaching

Abstract

The issue in this research stems from the lack of understanding among certified teachers in teaching Social Studies (IPS) regarding the preparation of lesson plans. The submission of learning materials often occurs late, sometimes two or three weeks after the learning process has begun, and there are even teachers who submit them at the end of the semester. In the implementation of learning, certified teachers have not fully used teaching methods that can explore students' abilities regarding the material being taught. Moreover, in the assessment process, the cognitive aspect is more frequently assessed compared to other aspects. The type of research used in this study is mixed-method research with a sequential exploratory design model. The first stage of the research uses qualitative methods, followed by quantitative methods. In the qualitative stage, observations and interviews were conducted with certified teachers in teaching Social Studies (IPS). The informants were determined using purposive sampling, resulting in a total of 11 certified teacher informants. In the quantitative research phase, data was collected through observations, interviews, and questionnaires. The data analysis used in this quantitative method is descriptive statistical analysis. Based on the research findings, it is revealed that Junior High Schools in Pariaman Tengah District, Pariaman City, implement the 2013 Curriculum. However, the implementation of the scientific approach stages is not running smoothly. The stages of associating and communicating are difficult to carry out. This is due to the lack of student motivation in expressing opinions or asking questions, resulting in the incomplete implementation of the 2013 Curriculum. The process of authentic assessment is also not perfect, as it predominantly focuses on cognitive assessment. The lack of appropriate textbooks also poses a challenge in the learning process, as the KTSP curriculum books are inadequate to support the teaching and learning process.

References

Aydin, A. M., Hossain, B., & Bae, S. H. (2021). The Adaptive Challenges of Curriculum Implementation: Insights for Educational Leaders. Education, 142(3), 61-78. Tersedia dari ERIC.

Carter, P., et al. (2020). Situating Curricular Leadership Challenges Within Adaptive Leadership Theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(1), 1-18. doi:10.1080/00220272.2019.1678708(ERIC).

David, J. (2011). Race to the Top and Reforming Education Through Standards-Based Testing. Educational Policy, 25(1), 17-26.

Hamilton, L., et al. (2007). Ensuring Test Standards Do Not Distort the Curriculum in Meaningful Learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(4), 425-444.

Heifetz, R., et al. (2009). Adaptive Leadership Framework and Its Application to Curriculum Reform. Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 611-617.

Ibeh, A. I. (2020). Curriculum Implementation Challenges to the New Social Studies Education Teacher. UNIZIK Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 1(1), 22-29. doi:10.4314/ijerps.v1i1(UniJerps).

Letseka, M. (2016). Open Distance Learning Through the Philosophy of Ubuntu. Nova Publishers.

McGregor, R., & Park, M. S. (2019). Towards a Deconstructed Curriculum: Rethinking Higher Education in the Global North. Journal of Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 332–345. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1566221(SpringerLink).

Milondzo, K. S., & Magongoa, M. C. (2018). Challenges Facing Secondary School Principals in Implementing the National Curriculum Statement. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 12(1), 60–70.

Mockler, N., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2018). Questioning the Language of Improvement and Reform in Education: Reclaiming Meaning. Routledge.

Nziramasanga, C. T. (1999). Report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry into Education and Training. Harare: Government of Zimbabwe.

Olofoson, M. & Bishop, P. (2018). Middle Social Studies Curriculum as a Site of Struggle for Social Justice. Springer.

The New Teacher Project. (2018). Ensuring Equitable Learning Opportunities for Historically Marginalized Populations. TNTP.

Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). Standardized Testing and Curriculum Reform: Consequences and Challenges. Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 23-37.

Valencia, R. R. (2010). Dismantling Deficit Thinking: Education Thought and Practice. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-16