Exploring Teachers’ Experiences of Digital Critical Reading Instruction in Secondary School Learning Environments in Indonesia

Authors

  • Syamsul Ghufron Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya Author

Keywords:

Digital Literacy, Critical Reading, Teacher Experience, Phenomenology, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, Digital Pedagogy

Abstract

Digital literacy has become a central concern in contemporary education as digital environments reshape how individuals engage with information, requiring new forms of critical reading competence. Within this evolving landscape, teachers’ experiences in navigating digitally mediated reading instruction remain understudied despite growing scholarly interest in the complexities of digital pedagogy. The specific phenomenon of how teachers interpret the emotional, cognitive, and pedagogical demands of teaching critical reading in digital contexts is still not well understood, raising the key question of how these experiences shape their instructional responses. Using an interpretative phenomenological approach, this study draws on in-depth semi-structured interviews with six secondary school teachers in Indonesia and reveals how teachers make sense of information overload, shifting student behaviors, and tensions between digital immediacy and reflective reading. Through in-depth semi-structured interviews and interpretative thematic analysis, the study shows that teachers experience digital critical reading instruction as a dynamic negotiation involving emotional strain, cognitive burden, and adaptive pedagogical reasoning; that they report three core experiential themes: (1) heightened emotional fatigue due to constant digital disruptions, (2) cognitive overload arising from fragmented digital texts, and (3) pedagogical adaptation characterised by the development of scaffolding techniques to foster deeper student engagement; that they develop personalized strategies to counter superficial reading habits; and that they construct meaning from these challenges in ways that influence their professional identities. These findings emerge from iterative coding, clustering of meaning units, and hermeneutic interpretation that illuminate the essence of teachers’ lived experiences in digital learning environments. The results enhance our understanding of digital literacy instruction by foregrounding the human experiences behind pedagogical decisions and highlighting the need for more reflective, experience-centered approaches in future research while offering concrete implications for teacher training and digital curriculum design.

References

Apostolopoulou, E., Chatzimentor, A., Maestre-Andrés, S., Requena-i-Mora, M., Pizarro, A., & Bormpoudakis, D. (2021). Reviewing 15 years of research on neoliberal conservation: Towards a decolonial, interdisciplinary, intersectional and community-engaged research agenda. Geoforum, 124, 236–256. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.006

Bellanova, R., & De Goede, M. (2022). The algorithmic regulation of security: An infrastructural perspective. Regulation and Governance, 16(1), 102–118. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12338

Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? Internet and Higher Education, 45. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722

Bonakdar, A., & Audirac, I. (2020). City Branding and the Link to Urban Planning: Theories, Practices, and Challenges. Journal of Planning Literature, 35(2), 147–160. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219878879

Cetindamar, D., & Abedin, B. (2021). Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: Conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(6), 1649–1672. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2020-0010

Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3

Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2024). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3240–3256. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044

Craig, G. (2021). Kindness and Control: The Political Leadership of Jacinda Ardern in the Aotearoa New Zealand COVID-19 Media Conferences. Journalism and Media, 2(2), 288–304. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2020017

Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students’ critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: A study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100627

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 57–63. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22

Jalalian Daghigh, A., & Abdul Rahim, H. (2021). Neoliberalism in ELT textbooks: An analysis of locally developed and imported textbooks used in Malaysia. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 29(3), 493–512. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1755888

Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371–388. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406

Kabeer, N. (2020). Women’s Empowerment and Economic Development: A Feminist Critique of Storytelling Practices in “Randomista” Economics. Feminist Economics, 26(2), 1–26. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2020.1743338

Le, L. H., Chong, C. S., & Wan, R. (2022). Critical reading in higher education: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101028

Meth, P., Goodfellow, T., Todes, A., & Charlton, S. (2021). CONCEPTUALIZING AFRICAN URBAN PERIPHERIES. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(6), 985–1007. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13044

Mukhlis, L. (2025a). A Phenomenological Study of Personal Spiritual Experiences in Navigating Religious Pluralism within Interfaith Communities. Irfana: Journal of Religious Studies, 1(6), 212–220.

Mukhlis, L. (2025b). Spiritual Grounds for Economic Growth: A Qualitative Exploration of Rural Indonesian Women’s Transformative Journeys Through Mosque-Led Empowerment Programs. Servina: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(8), 289–298.

Mukhlis, L., & Abdullah, M. N. (2025). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (1st ed.). Mukhlisina Revolution Center.

Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligenceand Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah: Revolutionizing Indonesia’s Sharia Online Trading System. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.238

Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., & Zulbaidah. (2025). Reorientation of Sharia Stock Regulations: Integrating Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah for Justice and Sustainability. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(10s), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i10s.1341

Mukhlis, L., Arifin, T., Ridwan, A. H., Zulbaidah, Rosadi, A., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Reformulation of Islamic Stock Law: The Application of Taṣarrufāt al-Rasūl and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ahto Develop a Dynamic and Sustainable Islamic Capital Market in Indonesia. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.913

Mukhlis, L., Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE: THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH AND MUSYARAKAH CONTRACTS. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 9(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.8466

Mukhlis, L., Maryam, S., & Sormin, S. A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Living History Berbasis PjBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Histografi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5595

Mukhlis, L., & Saidah, Y. (2025). Dynamics of Nature-Based learning in Developing Children’s Motoricic Skills: Teacher and Parent Perspectives. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.9366

Mukhlis, L., Suradi, Janwari, Y., & Syafe`i, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Saham Syariah sebagai Instrumen Pengembangan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim (BKMT) Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.51214/japamul.v3i2.604

Pallister-Wilkins, P. (2020). Hotspots and the geographies of humanitarianism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(6), 991–1008. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818754884

Priyono, A., Moin, A., & Putri, V. N. A. O. (2020). Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of smes during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1–22. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040104

Rekhviashvili, L., & Sgibnev, W. (2020). Theorising informality and social embeddedness for the study of informal transport. Lessons from the marshrutka mobility phenomenon. Journal of Transport Geography, 88. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.01.006

Salmerón, L., Delgado, P., & Mason, L. (2020). Using eye-movement modelling examples to improve critical reading of multiple webpages on a conflicting topic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 1038–1051. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12458

Siapera, E. (2022). AI Content Moderation, Racism and (de)Coloniality. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 4(1), 55–65. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-021-00105-7

Song, G. (2022). “Little Fresh Meat”: The Politics of Sissiness and Sissyphobia in Contemporary China. Men and Masculinities, 25(1), 68–86. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X211014939

Stein, S. (2020). What can decolonial and abolitionist critiques teach the field of higher education? Review of Higher Education, 44(3), 387–414. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2021.0000

Suchman, L. (2023). Imaginaries of omniscience: Automating intelligence in the US Department of Defense. Social Studies of Science, 53(5), 761–786. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221104938

Sund, L., & Pashby, K. (2020). Delinking global issues in northern Europe classrooms. Journal of Environmental Education, 51(2), 156–170. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1726264

Tsai, M.-J., Wu, A.-H., Bråten, I., & Wang, C.-Y. (2022). What do critical reading strategies look like? Eye-tracking and lag sequential analysis reveal attention to data and reasoning when reading conflicting information. Computers and Education, 187. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104544

Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour and Information Technology, 42(9), 1324–1337. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768

Winter, T. (2021). The geocultural heritage of the Silk Roads. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(7), 700–719. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1852296

Yang, W. (2022). Artificial Intelligence education for young children: Why, what, and how in curriculum design and implementation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100061

Yulian, R. (2021). The flipped classroom: Improving critical thinking for critical reading of efl learners in higher education. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 508–522. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.18366

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31